donation
To request Mental Health
Services or to access Mental
Health Crisis Services Call:
1-800-375-4357

Smoking
Resources
Basic InformationLatest News
Cigarette Sales Jumped During PandemicSwitch to Vaping Won't Help Ex-Smokers Quit for Good: StudyFDA Authorizes First E-CigaretteSilver Lining Found in Pandemic: Fewer Teens Are VapingSmoking, Drinking Gateway to Pot, Study FindsDelay in Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarettes Cost Lives: StudyPfizer Recalls All Lots of Anti-Smoking Drug Chantix Due to Potential CarcinogenIs There a Link Between Vaping and Eating Disorders in the Young?FDA Bans Sale of Nearly a Million E-Cigarettes; Allows Juul to Remain on MarketFDA Tells Three Small E-Cigarette Makers to Stop Selling Flavored ProductsKids Who Grew Up With Smokers Have Higher Odds for Rheumatoid ArthritisVaping Just Once Triggers Dangerous 'Oxidative Stress'Gruesome Cigarette Warnings May Work on Smokers: StudyAddictive, Harmful Vaping Is Super Cool on TikTokVaping During Pregnancy Could Raise Odds for 'Preemie' BabiesAHA News: Smoking Harms the Brain, Raises Dementia Risk – But Not If You QuitJuul to Pay $40 Million in N.C. Case Over Vaping's Harm to TeensSmokers, Obese People Need Major Heart Interventions Earlier in LifeDid People Smoke More or Less During the Pandemic?Many Heart Disease Patients Keep Smoking, Despite Knowing RisksYouth Vaping Rates Decline, But 1 in 5 U.S. Teens Still Uses E-CigsAHA News: Deep Disparities Persist in Who Gets Exposed to Secondhand SmokeDid a Ban on Flavored Vapes Raise Teen Smoking Rates?Vaping Ups Teens' Odds for Asthma, Asthma AttacksBreathing Other People's Smoke Can Raise Your Odds for Heart FailureFDA Poised to Ban Menthol CigarettesAHA News: Higher Pulse Pressure in Smokers May Signal Cardiovascular Disease RiskAdding Vaping to Smoking Brings Even Worse Respiratory EffectsRaising Legal Age for Tobacco Cuts Teen Smoking, Study Confirms'Garage Lab' Vape Products May Be Driving Lung Injury in Rural AppalachiaA Plus From the Pandemic: Fewer Kids Using E-CigarettesMaking E-Cigs Cool: Singers, Models in Music Videos Get Teens VapingCanada's Menthol Cigarette Ban Boosted Quit Rates: Would the Same Happen in U.S.?Most U.S. Adults Who Vape Want to Quit: StudyBored & Stressed, Smokers Smoked More  During PandemicSecondhand Smoke Is Sending Kids to the ERSmoking Rates High Among Surgery PatientsSwitch to Vaping Helps Smokers With Schizophrenia QuitSmoking Makes a Comeback in the PandemicCOVID Lockdowns Got People Smoking MoreMenthols Lured 10 Million Americans to Smoking Since 1980: StudyAnother Deadly Disease for Smokers: Pulmonary FibrosisHow Smoking Could Help Spur Breast Cancer's SpreadAHA News: Anxiety Is Linked With Smoking – But How Is Still HazyYouth Vaping Triples Odds for Adult SmokingSmoking Plus Vaping Just as Deadly as Smoking on Its Own: StudyEven 'Light' Smoking Can Quickly Become Addictive5 Tips to Help Quit Smoking in 2021Vaping May Addle the Adolescent BrainAfter Years of Increases, Teen Vaping Rates Take a Tumble
Questions and AnswersLinksBook Reviews
Related Topics

Medical Disorders
Wellness and Personal Development

Delay in Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarettes Cost Lives: Study

HealthDay News
by By Dennis Thompson HealthDay Reporter
Updated: Sep 27th 2021

new article illustration

MONDAY, Sept. 27, 2021 (HealthDay News) -- A specimen cup full of bloody urine.

Decaying feet that sport blackened, rotting toes -- some already amputated.

A pale boy with dark circles under his eyes, drawing breath through an oxygen mask.

Around 179,000 deaths in the United States might have been prevented over the past decade if smokers had been forced to confront such images every time they reached for a pack of cigarettes, a new study suggests.

Labels with graphic health warnings had been set to appear on cigarette packs in 2012, but tobacco industry legal action derailed that effort.

The warning labels are now scheduled to appear on packs starting next year, but the decade-long delay has cost tens of thousands of American lives, said senior author Rafael Meza, a professor of epidemiology and global public health at the University of Michigan.

"The evidence is out there from multiple countries that suggests these graphic health warnings do work as intended," Meza said. "If we had been able to implement this regulation back in 2012, many more lives could have been saved. This work shows the cost of industry litigation and procedures to delay implementation of tobacco regulations."

Meza and his colleagues project that more than a half million lives -- about 539,000 -- still could be saved by the turn of the century if no further delays occur.

About 120 countries around the world already have such graphic health warnings on cigarette packs, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Canada became the first in 2001; graphic images now cover three-quarters of the space on their tobacco packaging, researchers said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has a set of 13 graphic warning labels that would cover half of a cigarette pack's front and back. The warnings "stand to represent the most significant change to cigarette labels in 35 years," the agency says.

The labels contain disturbing images and short messages about lesser-known risks of cigarette smoking, including stunted fetal growth, age-related macular degeneration, bladder cancer, cataracts, COPD, heart disease, strokes, head and neck cancer, type 2 diabetes and erectile dysfunction.

"These graphic cigarette warning labels have been proven to be very effective, especially at prompting current smokers to end their addiction because they're staring at that pack," said Erika Sward, national assistant vice president of advocacy for the American Lung Association in Washington, D.C.

Rather than lung cancer, the warnings focus on "other diseases that are perhaps not as top-of-mind for smokers when they are thinking about the health consequences of their addiction," Sward added.

For this study, the researchers created a simulation model of how graphic warning labels might affect smoking trends.

They took estimates from previous studies regarding the effectiveness of explicit warning labels, and applied those estimates to federal data about the number of smokers and smoking deaths in the United States.

If the labels do go into effect next year, the model projects that the percentage of people smoking in the United States will drop from an estimated 13.6% in 2022 to 4.2% by 2100.

Only about 12.3% of Americans would now be smoking had the warning labels gone into effect in 2012, the model's results showed.

In 2019, about 14% of U.S. adults smoked, according to the most recent data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"When you think about a large country like the U.S., even if you can reduce prevalence by 1%, you're talking about millions of smokers," Meza said. "Just preventing a few smokers from engaging in the habit or helping them quit will result in considerable health gains."

These graphic label warnings would have added to other policies that have effectively curbed U.S. smoking, including tobacco taxes, smoke-free area laws, and bans on cigarette advertising, Sward and Meza said.

"This study really underscores why the tobacco industry views delays as wins, and why it's so important to move forward promptly with these effective policies," Sward said.

One of the tobacco industry's strategies over the years has been "delay, delay, delay," she said.

"The industry has delayed graphic warning labels for a decade now because they're putting profits over people's lives," Sward added.

She hopes studies like these will spur the FDA toward quicker action in other areas of tobacco control.

For example, the FDA said last spring that it would propose a rule to remove menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars from the marketplace, but nothing has been seen since, Sward said.

"That's kind of in the announced-but-not-acted-upon-yet category," she said of the April announcement.

Other actions being considered by the FDA and federal and state lawmakers include removing all flavored tobacco products from the market, imposing larger tobacco taxes, and funding a wider array of smoking cessation programs, Sward said.

Her group plans to support the FDA against any legal threat that might cause the graphic warning labels to be delayed again.

"The American Lung Association and our public health partners brought the lawsuit against FDA to compel them to move forward with the graphic warning labels as they were required to do under the Tobacco Control Act," Sward said. "Now we are working to support them fighting back against the tobacco industry."

The new study was published Sept. 24 in JAMA Health Forum.

More information

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has more about the proposed warning labels, including interactive examples.

SOURCES: Rafael Meza, PhD, professor, epidemiology and global public health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Erika Sward, assistant vice president, national advocacy, American Lung Association, Washington, D.C.; JAMA Health Forum, Sept. 24, 2021